The movie is quite a masterful bit of work, spanning the first two books of the series in two and a half hours and giving each character his or her due. Winona Ryder is perfect as the irrepressible Jo March who longs to make a career for herself and not get pinned down by societal pressures. Christian Bale is delightful as Theodore Laurence, the lonely rich boy who craves the company of the lively March girls next door. In his more angsty moments, my friend did point out some remarkable foreshadowing of the Batman angst to come. But otherwise he is swoon-worthy as ever, playing big brother to the girls and gradually hoping for a relationship laced with more romance.
Speaking of romance, I was struck anew with just how scandalous the movie was in comparison to the books. As liberal as Alcott's views on women and relationships were for her time, she would have been rather appalled. Like I mentioned in my Great Expectations post, modern adaptations tend to liberally sprinkle in kisses and hand-holding, which are tame today but would have caused a riot in the Victorian era. I have never minded this much, but somehow it seems terribly out of place in Little Women. The whole point of the books is that these romances develop very gradually. The rather perplexing twists that occur in some of the characters' love lives seem abrupt and senseless in the movie, whereas the books devote chapters to ensure that the transition from one love to another occurs seamlessly. There's a great deal of letter-writing that takes place in the novel, and somehow it is easier to imagine falling in love over a carefully written letter than a sudden kiss at the opera.
No comments:
Post a Comment