This week I watched two rather lackluster movies that both had good pedigrees but fell a bit flat on execution. If you're curious about these films, read on about these films, or go watch them first and then come discuss them with me in the comments!
Here: Directed by Robert Zemeckis, who co-wrote the screenplay with Eric Roth, based on Richard McGuire's graphic novel of the same name, this is a story that is mostly set in the living room of an American house. We travel back and forth in time focusing on this one square patch of land, so there is one sequence when we are literally seeing dinosaurs roam across it, then others where we see some Native Americans exploring the area. But the majority of this film is about the families who occupy the house that was eventually built on this land at the turn of the 20th century.
The meat of the story focuses on the Young family, consisting of a World War II veteran, Al (Paul Bettany), his wife, Rose (Kelly Reilly), and their children, one of whom grows up and marries a woman and continues to live in the family home. That couple is played in young (and old) adulthood by Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, and offers up a story about what happens when you get married too young and have to sacrifice your ambitions for a life of painful domesticity. And also reveals how de-aging software continues to evolve, as we first see Hanks and Wright as teenagers - let's just say I was not convinced.
This movie feels like it's made for our TikTok age, when no one can focus on a story for more than a few minutes at a time. Instead, we get fragments of story, told in short bursts, drunkenly weaving across time periods, covering some major historical events and milestones, some emotional milestones, but largely feeling like a gimmicky exercise in storytelling that doesn't have much of a story to tell. There's nothing particularly new and compelling that this movie can convey about its characters; it's just trying to tell their stories in a novel way that feels a bit forced and clunky. I won't lie, I definitely kept my eyes on the screen the whole time since I never knew where things were going next. But at the end of the film, did I feel like I had watched something worth leaving my own living room for? Nope.
Heretic: Written and directed by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods, this is a story about what happens when two Mormon missionaries, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East), end up at the house of a seemingly charming British man named Mr. Reed (played by the always deceptively charming Hugh Grant), who then proceeds to terrorize them as he has his own ideas about religion.
Obviously, I watched this movie because of Hugh Grant - I am 100% here for his villain era and was dying to see what he was going to do in this weird little horror film. His performance is thoroughly delightful, charming the women into his home and then quickly turning that twinkle in his eye into a manic glint. The two women also deliver excellent performances, East offering up a brilliant turn as a naive and sheltered missionary who is desperate to make a new convert and is hysterically polite even as it becomes clear that Reed is an absolute lunatic, while Thatcher is wonderful as the more suspicious woman who knows she shouldn't trust this man but now has to figure out how they can fight him. Interestingly, both East and Thatcher were raised as Mormons, though they aren't currently practicing. Unfortunately, there's only so much actors can do if there isn't much more to the story.
Ultimately, this script did not do it for me. There were some great monologues for Grant to chew on, but at the end of the day, this movie has nothing novel to say about religion and seems to struggle to find any point of view. It's basically a horror movie that's flailing for a premise and doesn't land on anything too exciting. Even as a horror film, I didn't find myself particularly enthralled - sure, there are plenty of quiet steps into dark places and you're waiting for something to go "Boo!" and scare the crap out of you. But that's about it - this movie is one long series of horror movie tropes and nothing beyond that. Like me, if you want to be a Hugh Grant completist, go ahead, but otherwise, I wouldn't expect this movie to blow your mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment